Report: Poverty rates on the rise throughout Las Vegas

Beyond the Sun

Newly released numbers from the Brookings Institution reflect what you probably sensed: Poverty rates intensified throughout the Las Vegas metropolitan area between 2000 and 2009.

The jump mirrored a nationwide trend: more people are living in neighborhoods where at least 40 percent of the residents live below the poverty line, according to a newly released analysis of 100 U.S. metropolitan areas conducted by Brookings’ Metropolitan Policy Program.

A decade ago, there was one such neighborhood in Las Vegas with about 3,500 residents. Two years ago, there were seven such neighborhoods with about 36,000 people.

The figures were drawn from a Brookings study of U.S. Census tracts, and the total number of Las Vegans living in such neighborhoods may be larger today, said Alan Berube, a senior fellow at Brookings and a co-author of the report. The analysis excluded census tracts in Henderson and North Las Vegas.

“There was a veritable explosion of very high poverty neighborhoods (nationally), most of it in the urban core,” Berube said. “I think it certainly took off at the back end of the decade but I wouldn’t be surprised if it wasn’t there in ’05, ’06 (when) the economy was humming along, but it was also humming along with low-wage jobs.”

Nationally, the percentage of the U.S. population living within such “extreme poverty neighborhoods,” where the typical family of four earns less than $22,350 annually, jumped by one-third between 2000 and 2009, according to Brookings.

Analysis of Census data typically lags two years behind because it takes that long for the numbers to be released.

“Extreme poverty neighborhoods grew in cities and suburbs alike during the 2000s, though the phenomenon remained a majority urban one,” read the report. “In 2005-09, cities contained over two-thirds of extreme poverty tracts within the nation’s largest 100 metro areas, and had a concentrated poverty rate of 20 percent, more than four times higher than suburbs.”

Brookings also found that just as suburbs outpaced cities for growth in the poor population as a whole over the decade, the number of poor living in extreme poverty neighborhoods in suburban communities grew by 54 percent, compared with 18 percent in cities. The poor population living in these suburban neighborhoods rose by 41 percent — more than twice as fast as the 17 percent growth in cities. Bottom line: Though cities still remained better off on these measures in 2005-09 than in 1990, suburbs had surpassed 1990 levels on almost every count.

The numbers were no surprise to Sue Steaffens, who oversees the distribution of federal dollars that help feed hungry students within the Clark County School District. Applications for free-and-reduced-cost lunches have exploded within the 308,000-student district amid the economic collapse. Schools with the greatest demand for the federally subsidized meals are found along Maryland Parkway, East Sahara Avenue, East Charleston Boulevard and in West Las Vegas, but no ZIP codes are immune to the need.

“Now we’re seeing it everywhere,” Steaffens said. “Schools that were used to being high are even higher for the number of participants. You get some of these other schools that are in Green Valley and Summerlin, they’re just not used to participating in the program.”



Previous Discussion:

Discussion 7 comments

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Maybe the conventions are following the adivce given by Obama and Harry Reid that is also celebrated by their supporters to take their business elsewhere. Obama suggest Orlando.

  2. We are a wealthy nation that has turned its collective back on the disadvantaged in a time of need. Food stamps, welfare and universal healthcare all need to be addressed if we are to regain our prosperity. A child who is hungry will not succeed in school, a man or woman without bus fare (or a working phone) can not work, a family with health issues destroys their ability to function on any level. We are the 99% asking the 1% to give us back our dignity and we will give you a capable work force.

  3. We are the most generous nation on earth when it comes to dealing with real poverty. In addition to an endless variety of government programs private welfare is unmatched anywhere else in the world. I am disgusted at the complaining by the losers involving their most recent mantra, "the top 1%". If you apply this figure to the world economy then $36,000 per year qualifies you as a member of this group. The top 1% in the United States provide for a much greater proportion of the private enterprise jobs created. Meanwhile the Obama administration has done absolutly nothing to ending our economic problems Does anyone really believe the 4Trillion dollare in debt this administration has burdened us with has made anything better? Obamacare is being exposed as the usual fraud, in any case and there is nothing else the whiners can point to as success.

  4. Thanks for nothing to our Nevada republican leaders like failures Jim Gibbons, John Ensign and the current crop of do-nothing lounge-lizards like Gov Sandoval, Senator Heller, Representative Heck and Representative Armodei. When will Nevada hold these worthless hacks accountable for our horrible Nevada economy? When will these politicians start actually trying to help Nevada rather than running errands for Rush Limbaugh?

  5. Excuse me, Judith, but the U.S. has spent trillions since "landslide" Lyndon's "Great Society" started doling out the moolah some 40 years ago and what have we gotten for all of that? More poverty, not less. We've seen housing project after housing project go from construction to degradation and to demolition, wasting billions. We've seen corruption and greed but no progress in the reduction of poverty and you want more of the same, Judith? Are you kidding? Doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results is the definition of insanity and that's what you champion. The problem isn't that we spend too little on some; it's that some expect too much! Time to let them sink or swim. Time to let them shoulder the responsibilities they have. Time to cut the imbilical cord. Time to quit giving them fish - time to teach them how to fish for themselves.

  6. Maybe acejoker Jim Reid is full of Fox doo.

  7. So we had one enclave on the list and now we have seven. I'll bite, what was the first and where are those enclaves at present.

    Institute Bob's 15% plan and more jobs will be here in Nevada then have been produced by the people responsible for bringing jobs, the city Mayors. Yes, it is the Mayor's job, not that of Congress to bring jobs to a city. How have we been doing with our current leadership?