Comments by user: kbingh

Righthaven, the best defender of fair use ever.

(Suggest removal) 6/20/11 at 2:19 p.m.

RIghthaven, the best defender of fair use ever.

(Suggest removal) 6/20/11 at 2:18 p.m.

Sgt Rock

I don't think they are ignoring copyright infringement but rather see the benefit of people linking to them and not alienating their customers and advertisers. I don't think the vast majority of newspapers care if people take some of the content as long as they link back.

When a small time newspaper can command a worldwide audience because of other blogs and sites link to them, create a buzz and go viral and become part of a worldwide discussion is not viewed as a bad thing.

I think there are newspapers listening to their SEO and marketing people and others like the LVRJ who are only listening to their lawyers.

(Suggest removal) 6/20/11 at 11:51 a.m.

Botx

Fair use mainly deals with what can be done with copyrighted works without permission so any TOS is irrelevant to fair use because, by definition, terms of service is a type of permission.

(Suggest removal) 6/20/11 at 9:49 a.m.

StRock

Sherman Frederick violated Stephens Media's own terms of service on this article by not properly citing the source of the articles he mentions from gametimeIP.com.

Stephens Media TOS states:

"Stephens Media welcomes hypertext links to its electronically-published textual content. The appropriate method for linking to Stephens Media content is to post only the headline and the first paragraph of a story and then a link to the original textual material."

This was some sloppy journalism by Sherman Frederick. No wonder he is no longer editor.

(Suggest removal) 6/20/11 at 8:26 a.m.

StgRock

I am glad you at least admitted that he did not cite the sources correctly and as I mentioned myself I would say Frederick is within fair use but it is still hypocritical for him to be doing any cut and pasting while at the same time calling others thieves.

I agree myself that cutting and pasting an entire article should not be done because you can get the important part of a story in just a short snippet but many do not believe in fair use at all or have it so narrowly defined as to render it meaningless.

(Suggest removal) 6/20/11 at 8:10 a.m.

Dave Butcher

Apparently only former RJ editors are allowed to post portions of other people's content.

I too would not even use the RJ to line a bird-cage, I mourn for the trees that are used to print it.

(Suggest removal) 6/20/11 at 7:14 a.m.

Sgt Rock

Click on this google search and it will give you a good example and prove my point. The search gives you both the gametimeIP post and Fredericks post and you will see he lifted the portions word for word.

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&h...

(Suggest removal) 6/20/11 at 6:19 a.m.